In order to ensure the fair, fair and smooth conduct of the second Global Future Space Innovation Challenge and improve the quality of competition selection, the following rules are formulated for the judges of the Future Space Innovation Challenge:
1.Entrusted by the Organizing Committee of the Future Space Innovation Challenge (hereinafter referred to as the “Competition Organizing Committee”), the competition judges are responsible for the independent evaluation of the participating projects and provide professional evaluation opinions.
2.The competition judges are composed of expert committee and evaluation committee. The evaluation committee is responsible for the preliminary review, the second round and the final project evaluation and scoring, the achievement evaluation, the consultation and evaluation, the project guidance and other assistance and improvement work. The expert committee participates in the review and comment of the final.
3.In principle, the expert group participating in the second round and final round is composed of 5 to 9 people, with a team leader who is responsible for the summary of the evaluation opinions of the experts of the group on the selected enterprise or team.
Conditions of Judges and Experts
(1)The judges should have good professional ethics, be conscientious, responsible, objective and impartial in the selection of the competition, and ensure the investment of time and energy.
(2)The judges should have rich industry background, in-depth understanding of the industry and technical field of the selected enterprise, and rich professional knowledge of the industry, market situation and technical field.
(3)In principle, the position of the judges recommended by the investment institution shall not be lower than that of the deputy director of investment.
Responsibilities and discipline of judges
(1).The judges shall independently, objectively, impartially and scientifically evaluate and grade the selected enterprises and teams according to the selection materials provided by the competition organizing committee office and the specified selection procedures.
(2).If the judges have an interest relationship with the participating enterprises or teams, which may affect the fairness of the selection work, they should take the initiative to withdraw from the competition organizing committee.
(3).The judges shall not take advantage of their special identity and influence to provide convenience for the participating enterprises and teams by abnormal means.
(4).Without the approval of the competition organizing committee, the judges shall not change the selection team on their own.
(5).The judges shall not conduct cross-group discussions that hinder the fair selection.
(6).The judges shall not disclose the list of selected enterprises and teams, and the list of judges. After logging into the judges’ own account, the judges must complete the whole selection work in the competition judges’ selection system and submit their evaluation opinions. All the selection materials received at the site shall be returned to the enterprise after the selection, and the selection results shall not be disclosed.
(7).The judges shall not ask for or accept gifts, cash gifts, negotiable securities, payment vouchers, banquets or other benefits and any benefits that may affect the fairness of the participating enterprises, teams or related personnel.
(8).The judges shall not disclose and use the technical and economic information and business secrets of the selected enterprise or team without authorization, and shall not copy, retain or spread the selection data to others. The judges must confirm and agree to the Letter of Commitment of the Judges.